<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" >

<channel>
	<title>KLAW 101 - Oklahoma&#039;s Best Country &#187; CoverGirl</title>
	<atom:link href="http://klaw.com/tags/covergirl/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://klaw.com</link>
	<description>Oklahoma&#039;s Best Country</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 05:59:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Taylor Swift&#039;s Photoshopped CoverGirl Ad Gets Pulled</title>
		<link>http://klaw.com/taylor-swift-photoshopped-covergirl-ad-pulled/</link>
		<comments>http://klaw.com/taylor-swift-photoshopped-covergirl-ad-pulled/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 17:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Billy Dukes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country Music News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CoverGirl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photoshop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taylor swift]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tasteofcountry.com/?p=62791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Procter and Gamble have pulled print advertisements featuring Taylor Swift wearing CoverGirl NatureLuxe Mousse Mascara, but it&#8217;s not because of anything the 22-year-old country beauty did or didn&#8217;t do. The images were &#8220;enhanced in post production,&#8221; meaning they were Photoshopped to expand upon the makeup&#8217;s effect. That&#8217;s a no-no, according to the Council of Business [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Procter and Gamble have <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/business/2011/12/procter-gamble-pulls-photoshopped-taylor-swift-mascara-ad/" >pulled print advertisements</a> featuring <a href="http://tasteofcountry.com/tags/taylor-swift/">Taylor Swift</a> wearing CoverGirl NatureLuxe Mousse Mascara, but it&#8217;s not because of anything the 22-year-old country beauty did or didn&#8217;t do. The images were &#8220;enhanced in post production,&#8221; meaning they were Photoshopped to expand upon the makeup&#8217;s effect. That&#8217;s a no-no, according to the Council of Business Bureau Claims.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://klaw.com/taylor-swift-photoshopped-covergirl-ad-pulled/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://wac.450F.edgecastcdn.net/80450F/klaw.com/files/2011/12/swift-cg1.jpg" height="420" width="630" /><media:description xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">Courtesy of Procter and Gamble</media:description>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 708/735 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via wac.450F.edgecastcdn.net/80450F/klaw.com

Served from: klaw.com @ 2013-05-21 06:45:42 -->